Second Reflection on the Lambeth Conference.
Bishop Martin
‘The Permafrost and the African Bible’
In the Paisley of my childhood, the
Bible was something black, that was ‘brandished’ in various locations from the
lap of my unhappy grandfather to the bed-side table of my Mother.

The Bible was
not a book, but an instrument; frankly, of the controlling world of adults and
the judgement of a God I could not discern or make sense of in any way. You
might think it strange; therefore, that I now find myself a Bishop, who, after
all is expected to be a prime holder of the truth of Holy Scripture. After all,
at the Lambeth Conference, the three great planks on which Anglicanism is
founded are Scripture, Tradition and Reason.
So when it became clear at the Lambeth
Conference that almost every day following breakfast there would be a Bible
Study, my first reaction was to grit my teeth. That is not to suggest that the
Bible was and is not of vital importance to me. At King’s College, London, in
the 1960s, where I was taught theology in , the Bible was seen as a highly
complex piece of literature that revealed in varying and sometimes in
conflicting ways, the story of liberation of a people through suffering, death,
triumph, starvation, plenty, deceit, truth, hatred, love, betrayal, loyalty,
humour and seriousness…. and belief
and unbelief. The complexity of this Bible; this ‘library of the history of
salvation’, demanded that the priest in training, must take seriously the
literary analysis and criticism that was determined to find out the true
sources of the Bible; who was involved in the creation of the writings and for
what and whose purpose they were written. The reality was and remains, in my
view, that there are some well founded theories that this science has still to
finalise, but uncertainty remains. For me that uncertainty adds to the
adventure and importance of the Bible, about which there is always a question
mark. Sadly, from my perspective, much of that critical approach to the Bible
has disappeared. However, I with the Bishop of Lincoln, a good friend of mine,
did our best to remind the Conference that Anglicanism has been at the
forefront of Biblical criticism.
I feel that there is a Christian
mentality now that wants little else but
certainties.
Bible studies can often be the place where certainties are hungered for and
truth is in danger of being a casualty.
But, but! There on the first morning of the
Bible Study, I was in a tiny supervision room of
One of the bishops was from a strong evangelical
tradition and had attended the conference in Jerusalem (GAFCON) on reasserting
traditional Christian values; the Archbishop from
St John’s Gospel ‘I am’ sayings (‘I am the
Bread of Life, I am the door, I am the good shepherd etc’) became not sayings
to be examined under a literary microscope, but beautiful summonings for us to
be brought into Christ. And here’s the perspective that for some may be
difficult to take. To be in Christ is for each of us to be the ‘I am’! So, as you can imagine, there were moments of
silence. What dawned on us all, from our different perspectives, was that
because the Bishop is an apostle of Christ, he/she is therefore ‘I am’ – the
presence of the Word to be discovered in each corner of each Diocese at any
given moment. Laughter, sadness, empathy
and listening formed the basic chemistry of the group. A few of us did fly the
flag for biblical criticism. That didn’t distract us from the subjective
engagement with the text, but deepened that engagement. [If you go into the Lambeth Conference website, and click on the
‘resources’ page, you will find an excellent approach to St John’s Gospel which
complements the Bible Study process at the conference itself. It’s called
‘Signs on the Way’. You can download it in different formats to suit you. You
might find it useful as a basis for a Bible Study in your charges.]
Now, before you read on, I would like you to
get your Bible… yes over there in the corner. No, it’s not black, I know. Now
open it up and read 2 Samuel 13.1-22. I’ll wait until you’re finished…… The
reason I have asked you to do that is because I now want you to imagine a huge
Marquee (‘Big Top’) in which about a thousand people are gathered. One of the
Bible Study sessions at the Lambeth Conference was held with everyone together.
Professor Gerald West a South African Biblical Scholar (with film star good
looks!) had asked that the men (Bishops mostly, with a few male spouses) be on
one side and women on the other (Mostly spouses, with a few women Bishops).
This was a Bible Study on the story you have just read about Tamar – a raped
woman, as you will gather from the text. [When was the last time you heard that
story read?] Gerald split us up into fours, which enabled us simply to turn
around to those closest to us and share our feelings about the characters who
abused, were abused, who didn’t want to face the truth, who held their dignity,
who resisted acknowledging the reality of abuse. Roving microphones picked up some
reflections from each group. The atmosphere was electric. In so many cultures,
abuse is not acknowledged, let alone talked about. Facing up to the potential
in all of us, including in me a Bishop, to abuse others in ways subtle and not
so subtle, was the painful but creative outcome of what was astonishingly skilful
and, for me at least, harrowing experience.
What occurs to me is that perhaps from time to
time, more of our charges might risk such an approach to Scripture in the
middle of the Eucharist. What would happen if occasionally at a Eucharist,
following the Gospel, you simply turned to those closest to you and shared your
feelings about the Gospel? If then the reflections were pooled…. Who knows what
might come out of it….?
Thank you Lambeth Conference for renewed
inspiration in the Bible as it becomes a living present engagement with Christ.
My next reflection will look at an approach that was adopted by the Conference
to sharing critical issues of our time in a way that has been developed over
the centuries in